CogVideoX-5B vs Wan 2.2-5B — Two Excellent Open Options
Both are open—and both are solid. CogVideoX-5B tends to produce crisper visual detail and effects when you feed it a descriptive prompt and enough VRAM.Wan 2.2-5B is the efficiency star—720p iterations on a single high-end consumer GPU, great motion and cinematics with less friction.
Understanding Each AI Video Model
CogVideoX-5B: Rich Frames, VFX-friendly
Strengths: Sharp frames; good at lighting/texture adjectives; fun for stylized VFX moments.
User-created video using CogVideoX-5B on GenAIntel
Wan 2.2-5B: Efficient Cinematic Iteration
Strengths: 720p at reasonable speed on a single GPU; motion feels cinematic; easy to iterate.
User-created video using Wan 2.2-5B on GenAIntel
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Feature | CogVideoX-5B | Wan 2.2-5B |
|---|---|---|
| Visual character | Sharper frames, effects-friendly | Cinematic motion, efficient 720p |
| Resources | Heavier VRAM | Friendly for single-GPU pipelines |
| Best for | Stylized concept shots, VFX tests | Rapid prototyping, affordable 720p drafts |
My Take
If my brief screams "texture and light," I try CogVideoX-5B first
Perfect for stylized concept shots, VFX tests, and when you need sharper frames with more visual detail.
If I'm churning lots of versions and want 720p quickly, Wan-5B is perfect
Ideal for rapid prototyping, affordable 720p drafts, and when you need efficient iteration on modest hardware.
You can run both from one prompt in GenAIntel and decide in minutes.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is easier to run locally?
Wan-5B—lighter, faster to iterate.
Which looks crisper per frame?
CogVideoX-5B often looks sharper if you've got the VRAM.
Do either support audio?
No—both are visual-only.
Ready to Compare CogVideoX-5B vs Wan 2.2-5B Yourself?
Stop wondering which AI video model works best for your needs. Test CogVideoX-5B and Wan 2.2-5B side-by-side with your own prompts on GenAIntel's comparison platform.
Start Comparing Now